Archive for January, 2007

Unreal

A few minutes after I arrived at work yesterday a coworker informed me that a recent graduate of ours had just overdosed and died. I was strangely unresponsive, unaffected by the news. A short while later I was called over to another part of the hospital to assist in a “psychiatric crisis.” A boy–thirteen or fourteen years old maybe–was threatening to punch a nurse in the face. The hospital is woefully understaffed on the weekends, and I was the only male in the building. Although all employees are trained to deal with these situations, the hospital culture is such that the males are expected to do the “dirty work” of physical restraint. Still processing the tragic news from earlier in the day, I keyed in to the locked hallway, approached the angry young man, and calmly talked to him. I spent about thirty minutes with this kid, who eventually broke down in tears about being institutionalized and kept from seeing his family. He said he had not seen his little brother and sister in over a year.

When he was settled down, we parted with a fist-tap and I returned to my unit. The nurse informed me that the kids were rowdy and disrespectful in my absence. I called them out to the group room and coldly meted out consequences (some written assignments and snack privileges revoked). Throughout the evening the kids kept asking me if I was alright. “You look mad” one said. I said I was fine. And I really didn’t feel mad. I didn’t feel much of anything, really.

As the kids were getting ready for bed, a girl pulled me aside to have a word with me. She had been passed a note by one of the boys while we lined up to go to the AA Meeting earlier. She wanted to turn it in to me to avoid getting in trouble (she had seen other patients get busted for such things). This girl was close to the young man who had just overdosed. They were from the same town, had gotten high with each other many times. I asked her how she was doing with the whole thing. She said, “It doesn’t seem real.”

The whole evening seemed unreal to me, like I was an android going through preprogrammed motions. I’ve known from the beginning that the “success rate” (however that’s defined) is painfully low in psychological treatment of any kind. Most of the kids that go through our program return to the drug abuse and criminality they’ve known much of their lives. Many end up in detention centers. Some die. The young man who left us, he often said, “I’m scared of going back out there and dying.” He had a two-month old son. The lasting image I have of him is the big smile he had on his face when I asked him how his visitation with his little boy went. “It was great.” he said.

I’d like to believe he was sincere about his treatment, and that he left us with the intention of trying a different way to live. He left the treatment center before he was ready, due to a lack of insurance coverage. This hurts. Today we’re sending another boy home for the same reason.

Whatever happened, happened. Whatever will happen, will happen. This afternoon, I’ll clock in again and do my thing. It all seems so unreal.

“Put down that telescope Galileo, and look me in the eye!”

In response to ~C4Chaos’s evolving thoughts on Sam Harris, particularly the following [referring to Robert Godwin's critique]:

I do think that Sam Harris is fighting a good fight here. So instead of taking the dude down and insulting him downright, why not build on top of his arguments? I think building on Sam Harris’ work, like taking what’s partially right and extending his rational arguments into the transational, is a more “integral” way of doing it.

C-

Robert Godwin misses the point by a hundred miles, as do (in my opinion) nearly all the Harris critics I’ve read so far. Religion is just too personal a topic for most people to discuss, I guess. Clear thinking just goes out the window when ones most cherished attachments are challenged.

I was reading the Harris-Sullivan debate the other day and was utterly unable to see how any clear thinking person could see anything but Harris mopping the floor with Sullivan’s arguments. I’m sure this has something to do with my own blind spots, but thus far I’ve not heard a single critique of Harris’s position that rings true to me.

When you say “Let’s build on his ideas” or “extend them into the transrational,” it sounds a little condescending, as if the wider, broader, integral perspective is obviously more appropriate in all situations. I don’t think this is the case, and I think many so-called “integral” critiques fail in this respect. Harris is looking through a particular lens–at a particular level of magnification–when he looks at how we apply reason and rationality to religious beliefs. Just because there is a wider view available doesn’t mean it’s more appropriate to the question at hand. If you want to explore the meaning of facial expressions, the view from your own two eyes is more appropriate than both a microscope and a telescope. Likewise, I think that Harris’s analyses are dead on and appropriate to the specific points he’s making, and while changing the level of magnification to see the bigger, integral picture might be useful when addressing other questions, like how to deal with the problem of religious lunacy, when it comes to establishing the fact of said lunacy, flipping the switch to “integral” can just make things blurry.

–Bob

Something somewhere

My first fiddle-about with iMovie, featuring a snippet from an old tune written during a very productive period of my life. For some reason, earlier today I felt like revisiting some journal entries from about that time (a little more than five years ago). I had been reading Wilhelm Reich’s The function of the orgasm and my mind was sparkling with insight and creativity. Two days before my 31st birthday, I wrote the following note after a long riff about Reich’s theories:

Saki Santorelli from UMASS has some mindfulness clinic at the university. He spoke on NPR today and seems to “get it.” Need to check him out.

So, I checked him out today, over five years after the fact, and I was super impressed with the Center for Mindfulness at the UMASS Medical School. My wife and I have been planning to move to Massachusetts once she finishes her PhD here at the University of Kentucky. I will be looking into the Center for Mindfulness in much more depth in the coming weeks, and I’ll report my findings as they trickle in.

There surely must be something somewhere…

What it takes

C_0684827921.jpg

I’m reading a biography of Frieda Fromm-Reichmann (To redeem one person is to redeem the world, by Gail Hornstein) and I’m amazed at how Frieda’s education unfolded in such a dynamic and organic fashion. Adapting to wars, anti-Semitism, sexism–it didn’t seem to matter what was going on, Frieda pressed on and got the most out of every opportunity. As with many people who become great at something, Frieda had undeniable talent, but it was through an extraordinary work ethic that she was able to make the most of her potential.

Bill over at Integral Options Café wrote about his own education and how it wasn’t all it was cracked up to be. I feel the same way about my own formal education. Beyond the fourth grade, school amounted to little more than an ongoing process of having to adapt to artificial social situations that existed nowhere outside of school. In short, it was a waste of time, and later on, when it became a matter of “higher education,” there was a good deal of money wasted as well. With a decent internet connection and a library card, I could learn more in six months than I did in four years of college.

What’s done is done, though, and there’s no reason I can’t continue to self-direct my education for the remainder of my life. It’s the work ethic I seem to lack. I like sleep too much, and purposeless playing-around time. This morning I woke up early (relatively) and worked out before I even knew what planet I was on. There are a million things I want to do, songs I want to record, languages to learn, books to write, states of consciousness to explore. There’s just not enough time it seems, and I don’t even have kids. How can anyone work full-time AND have kids AND have a bit of time or energy left to do anything else?

I wonder again and again: Do I have what it takes to be great?

Sam Harris and Integral Theory

My friend Julian (over on the II-Zaadz forum) asked for an “Integral critique” of Sam Harris, and I couldn’t resist jumping into the fray:

I have given Sam Harris more than a bit of thought over the past few months:

Rational dialogue and human development
Atheism, meaning and morality
Why won’t God heal amputees
The great divide
Itchy fingers

I have a hard time thinking about what an “Integral” response to ANY issue looks like, to tell you the truth. Most so-called “Integral” analyses strike me as little more than oversimplified, misapplied developmental arguments, usually filtered through the kaleidoscopic lens of Wilber’s Spiral Dynamics Rainbow.

As I said before, I think Harris is quite clear as to what “level” of religion he is criticizing, i.e. the literalist/fundamentalist level. He’s also quick to point out that most of the people who embrace unreasonable, irrational beliefs in the religious sphere, are quite capable of (in fact, they insist on) being rational and reasonable in all other spheres of life. So, it doesn’t make sense to me to say “We need mythic level religion as a conveyor belt for all those pre-rational people out there.” These people are not “pre-rational” in any other area of their lives. They are not six year olds. A truly pre-rational person (i.e. a six year old) would only be confused by a church sermon or a Buddhist Satsang.

What a pre-rational person needs is a proper environment in which to naturally develop to the rational stage. Like I said before, religion is totally unnecessary for this process, as further brain development and Sesame Street take care of this quite nicely.

What Harris is trying to expose and knock down is the taboo against using our given rational capacities in the religious sphere. If Integral Theory applies here, perhaps it is in how the cognitive line relates to the spiritual line. I have too many questions about the concept of a “spiritual line” to take that any further right now.

This whole issue is personal, I think we must all admit. When I was twelve years old or so, it was rational arguments, like the ones Harris provides, that spared me from indoctrination into the world of mythic religion. It was this wholesale rejection of religion that, for me, cleared the way for development of a rational, then transrational spirituality. Rationality was my conveyor belt, and a set of parents who did not reinforce the taboo against criticizing religion. I’ll shut up now.

Bad dancing

I’m finally feeling better, seeing things a little clearer. It’s easy to see now how far off the path I have strayed. Fortunately, I often have the impulse to write when I’m graced with moments of clarity, so I have all these blog posts and journal entries to help me remember the core insights that have contributed most to my sanity over the years. Coming out of the fog, I find myself retracing my steps, looking for a little familiar ground from which to carry on.

Today I made it back to base camp by way of jumping around the room like a lunatic. Strange as it may sound, this has been by core spiritual practice for the past decade or so. Calling what I did today “movement meditation” sounds pretentious as hell, considering that a fly on the wall would probably call it “bad dancing,” but whatever the label it left me in a state of energized clarity. And I’ve repeatedly discovered over the years that if I do whatever it takes to keep the window of my soul clean, everything else just takes care of itself. What baffles me is that while I know this to be true and also know precisely the set of daily practices that keep my grounded and clear-minded, I still choose–again and again–to ignore these hard-won insights. The price I pay for this ignorance is lost time, lost hope, and developmental arrest. I make myself spiritually sick until everything I do feels as fruitless as the dry heaves. I’m like so many of the drug addicts I work with–I know what to do, yet for some reason I don’t do it.

There’s a part of me that doesn’t want to change, that doesn’t want to grow, that doesn’t want to see things clearly. And that part of me can’t stand bad dancing.

Ascendio!

blacklake.jpg

This is my first post of the new year, not because I don’t have anything to say but because I don’t have anything good to say. Being sick has clouded my perception, and I find myself worrying that I’ll never snap out of it, that I’m all tapped out of vitality and creativity. I certainly feel a great deal of compassion for anyone who suffers from poor health. All I have is some sort of flu thing, and I feel like I’m losing my spiritual marbles.

This time of year tends to be tough for me. It’s probably just the winter blues, and I’m just blowing it all out of proportion. With me, everything has to have some great spiritual significance. I have trouble accepting sometimes that I’m just a regular shlub, no different than the next guy. Even getting sick wounds my pride as well as my body, and you’ll often hear me say things like “I never get sick,” as if my typical state of good health is evidence of self-mastery or a high level of psycho-spiritual development. Yeah, I’m a piece of work, that’s for sure.

Overblown ego aside, I don’t think it’s necessarily a bad thing to be concerned (okay, obsessed!) with ones state of spiritual fortitude. Narcissistic though it may be, I like feeling as if every obstacle in my life needs to handled just right, like there’s something on the line in all that I do. My wife and I watched a Harry Potter movie (Goblet of Fire) the other night, and something lit up in me. With Harry, everything he does is part of some grand destiny, and however grandiose is might seem (and probably is), I’ve been happiest in my life when I feel the same way, like every move I make is just as it should be, not preordained necessarily, but at least congruent with the full unfolding of my deepest intentions and potential.

At one point in Goblet of Fire Harry uses a spell to propel himself to the surface of the Black Lake. Say it with me now: ASCENDIO!

Hmmm… I still feel like crap. What the hell? I guess there must be some magic key or something I’m supposed to find down here before I can come up for air. Yeah, that’s it, a magic key. Then, enlightenment shall at last be mine. IT SHALL BE MI…(interrupted by a hacking cough).